HTGC vs. UTF
HTGC (Hercules Capital, Inc.) and UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, HTGC returned 13.89%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for UTF. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HTGC vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTGC achieves a -12.79% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 17.84% return. Over the past 10 years, HTGC has outperformed UTF with an annualized return of 13.89%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively lower 11.75% annualized return.
HTGC
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -12.79%
- 6M
- -12.84%
- 1Y
- -3.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
UTF
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 19.68%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
HTGC vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc. | -12.79% | 3.54% | 33.33% | 42.91% | -10.42% | 26.50% | 14.49% | 39.86% | -6.86% | 1.86% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 17.84% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTGC and UTF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2005 | 0.33 |
The correlation between HTGC and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HTGC:
$3.05B
UTF:
$2.65B
HTGC:
$1.49
UTF:
$6.79
HTGC:
10.40
UTF:
4.03
HTGC:
0.32
UTF:
0.03
HTGC:
5.21
UTF:
6.85
HTGC:
1.37
UTF:
0.93
HTGC:
$578.18M
UTF:
$387.16M
HTGC:
$510.74M
UTF:
$388.42M
HTGC:
$380.44M
UTF:
$765.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTGC vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
HTGC
UTF
HTGC vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTGC | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.37 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 2.79 | -3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTGC vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTGC drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTGC and UTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTGC | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.21% | -72.62% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.74% | -10.33% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.97% | -21.06% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -30.28% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.54% | -52.53% | -5.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.54% | 0.00% | -17.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -10.36% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.98% | 5.05% | +5.93% |
Volatility
HTGC vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.43%. This indicates that HTGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTGC | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 2.43% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.04% | 8.40% | +11.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.30% | 12.40% | +10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 18.33% | +7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.84% | 23.34% | +4.50% |
Dividends
HTGC vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
HTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.68%, more than UTF's 6.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc. | 11.68% | 9.99% | 9.56% | 11.40% | 13.77% | 9.76% | 9.02% | 9.49% | 11.40% | 9.45% | 8.79% | 10.17% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.87% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Financials
HTGC vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hercules Capital, Inc. and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HTGC and UTF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTGC has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to UTF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTGC dropped -68.21% vs UTF's -72.62%.
UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTGC and UTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer