HTEC vs. TRUH
HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. HTEC is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HTEC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
HTEC vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HTEC
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 38.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- -3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.73%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $648.14K | $1.29M | $661.96K | |
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K |
HTEC vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 15.36% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTEC and TRUH is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTEC vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
HTEC
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTEC vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTEC | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTEC vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTEC | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.53% | -4.51% | -53.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.08% | -2.75% | -22.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.95% | -1.64% | -27.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | — | — |
Volatility
HTEC vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTEC | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.21% | 17.62% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 17.62% | +7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 17.62% | +7.81% |
HTEC vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTEC vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTEC and TRUH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HTEC.
HTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HTEC and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for HTEC and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer