HTEC vs. LFSC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC).

HTEC and LFSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HTEC is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2019. LFSC is an actively managed fund by F/m Investments. It was launched on Oct 30, 2024.

Performance

HTEC vs. LFSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HTEC vs. LFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF	-6.51%	23.91%	2.30%
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF	-4.45%	56.54%	-6.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly lower than LFSC's -4.45% return.

HTEC

• 1D: 3.47%
• 1M: -7.69%
• YTD: -6.51%
• 6M: 7.99%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 3.80%
• 5Y*: -5.56%
• 10Y*: —

LFSC

• 1D: 6.16%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: -4.45%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 55.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTEC vs. LFSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than LFSC's 0.54% expense ratio.

HTEC

ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF

LFSC

F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF

Return for Risk

HTEC vs. LFSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTEC

HTEC Risk / Return Rank: 51
HTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
HTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
HTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 47

LFSC

LFSC Risk / Return Rank: 86
LFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
LFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTEC vs. LFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTEC	LFSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.93	-1.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.65	-1.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.33	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	3.20	-1.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	8.96	-4.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTEC vs. LFSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the LFSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTEC and LFSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTEC	LFSC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	1.93	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.94	-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between HTEC and LFSC is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HTEC vs. LFSC - Dividend Comparison

HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while LFSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF	1.05%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HTEC vs. LFSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, which is greater than LFSC's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and LFSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTEC	LFSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.53%	-29.74%	-27.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.31%	-16.25%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.69%	-11.08%	-24.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.85%	-8.25%	-20.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.85%	5.80%	-0.95%

Volatility

HTEC vs. LFSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) is 7.96%, while F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) has a volatility of 10.35%. This indicates that HTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTEC	LFSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.96%	10.35%	-2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.40%	19.97%	-5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.82%	29.24%	-5.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.29%	29.31%	-5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.53%	29.31%	-3.78%