HTEC vs. GSKH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) and GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - HTEC tracks the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index while GSKH tracks the GSK plc Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HTEC returned 28.67% vs 42.66% for GSKH. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTEC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GSKH.

Performance

HTEC vs. GSKH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than GSKH's 9.90% return.

HTEC

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 6M: -2.52%
• 1Y: 28.67%
• 3Y*: 6.38%
• 5Y*: -5.86%
• 10Y*: —

GSKH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 10.56%
• 1Y: 42.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTEC vs. GSKH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF	-0.55%	21.05%
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	9.90%	36.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HTEC and GSKH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

HTEC vs. GSKH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTEC

HTEC Risk / Return Rank: 38
HTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
HTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 37
HTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
HTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 31

GSKH

GSKH Risk / Return Rank: 51
GSKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GSKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GSKH Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GSKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GSKH Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTEC vs. GSKH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HTEC	GSKH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.64	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.43	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	2.31	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	6.06	-1.84

HTEC vs. GSKH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the GSKH Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTEC and GSKH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HTEC vs. GSKH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, which is greater than GSKH's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and GSKH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTEC	GSKH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.53%	-18.54%	-38.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.31%	-18.54%	+2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.59%	-11.62%	-19.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.00%	-5.86%	-23.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.81%	7.06%	-0.25%

Volatility

HTEC vs. GSKH - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTEC	GSKH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.74%	6.89%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.77%	18.67%	-2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.92%	26.14%	-5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.50%	26.95%	-2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.46%	26.95%	-1.49%

HTEC vs. GSKH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GSKH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTEC vs. GSKH - Dividend Comparison

HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than GSKH's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	2.82%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF	0.99%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTEC and GSKH in my portfolio?

HTEC and GSKH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HTEC or GSKH?

GSKH has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to HTEC (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTEC dropped -57.53% vs GSKH's -18.54%.

Which ETF is better, HTEC or GSKH?

On 1-year performance, GSKH leads with 42.66% vs 28.67% for HTEC. On fees, GSKH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HTEC or GSKH?

Over the 1-year period, GSKH has performed better with a 42.66% return vs 28.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTEC or GSKH?

GSKH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HTEC or GSKH?

GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.99% for HTEC.

What is the main difference between HTEC and GSKH?

HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index, while GSKH tracks GSK plc Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HTEC and 0.19% for GSKH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSKH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.