PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTEC vs. CANC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HTEC vs. CANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HTEC vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
-6.51%23.91%2.68%-2.94%-33.72%-4.35%
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
5.69%42.92%-5.37%510.51%-85.34%-51.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTEC achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly lower than CANC's 5.69% return.


HTEC

1D
3.47%
1M
-7.69%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
7.99%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
-5.56%
10Y*

CANC

1D
4.66%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
5.69%
6M
27.93%
1Y
52.46%
3Y*
140.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HTEC vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTEC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than CANC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HTEC vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTEC
HTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CANC
CANC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTEC vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTECCANCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.94

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

2.59

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.86

-2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.40

13.76

-9.36

HTEC vs. CANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the CANC Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTEC and CANC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTECCANCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.94

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

-0.04

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between HTEC and CANC is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HTEC vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison

HTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than CANC's 0.05% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
HTEC
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF
1.05%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
0.05%0.06%3.00%0.56%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HTEC vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTEC drawdown since its inception was -57.53%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTEC and CANC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HTECCANCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.53%

-97.53%

+40.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-12.40%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.69%

-56.19%

+20.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-73.91%

+45.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

3.61%

+1.24%

Volatility

HTEC vs. CANC - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) have volatilities of 7.96% and 8.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HTECCANCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

8.36%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

16.34%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.82%

27.24%

-3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.29%

285.66%

-261.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

285.66%

-260.13%