PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTD vs. RQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTD vs. RQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTD achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly lower than RQI's 18.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HTD has underperformed RQI with an annualized return of 8.34%, while RQI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.81% annualized return.


HTD

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
10.11%
6M
8.09%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
8.34%

RQI

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
18.94%
6M
17.42%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTD vs. RQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTD
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
10.11%15.87%25.68%-9.92%-6.24%32.36%-16.54%42.77%-9.13%16.47%
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
18.94%2.07%8.04%15.74%-31.07%56.64%-9.28%54.62%-11.11%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HTD and RQI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2004

0.55

The correlation between HTD and RQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTD vs. RQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTD
HTD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
HTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

RQI
RQI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTD vs. RQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTDRQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.19

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.34

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

3.99

+4.62

HTD vs. RQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the RQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTD and RQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTDRQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.06

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.19

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.33

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.28

+0.15

Drawdowns

HTD vs. RQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTD drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTD and RQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTDRQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

-91.59%

+21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-11.74%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.94%

-22.43%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.58%

-41.06%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.57%

-59.12%

+2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-2.02%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-17.93%

+9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.94%

-1.73%

Volatility

HTD vs. RQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) is 2.66%, while Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that HTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTDRQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

4.02%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

11.59%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

14.90%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

22.95%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.62%

26.94%

-4.32%

HTD vs. RQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTD has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than RQI's 2.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTD vs. RQI - Dividend Comparison

HTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than RQI's 8.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTD
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
7.43%7.51%7.52%8.73%7.36%5.80%7.97%6.06%10.09%8.85%7.30%7.06%
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
8.70%9.54%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTD and RQI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RQI has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to HTD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTD dropped -69.79% vs RQI's -91.59%.

HTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTD and RQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer