HTD vs. CEFS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTD (John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund) and CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) are both funds - HTD is a Dividend fund managed by John Hancock, while CEFS is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Over the past 5 years, HTD returned 8.04%/yr vs 13.85%/yr for CEFS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTD charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for CEFS.

Performance

HTD vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTD achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 13.75% return.

HTD

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 6M: 8.09%
• 1Y: 18.96%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: 8.34%

CEFS

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 4.35%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 15.64%
• 1Y: 25.00%
• 3Y*: 22.04%
• 5Y*: 13.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTD vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund	10.11%	15.87%	25.68%	-9.92%	-6.24%	32.36%	-16.54%	42.77%	-9.13%	2.93%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	13.75%	16.67%	23.48%	20.99%	-7.08%	17.86%	3.40%	28.41%	-9.97%	7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HTD and CEFS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017	0.41

The correlation between HTD and CEFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HTD vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTD

HTD Risk / Return Rank: 38
HTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
HTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HTD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
HTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
HTD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 80
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTD vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTD	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.53	-0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	3.71	-1.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.48	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	4.43	-1.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	17.26	-8.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTD vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTD and CEFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTD	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	2.53	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	1.06	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.79	-0.37

Drawdowns

HTD vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTD drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, which is greater than CEFS's maximum drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTD and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTD	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.79%	-38.99%	-30.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-5.67%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.94%	-13.37%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.58%	-16.85%	-14.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	-0.51%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-3.67%	-5.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	1.45%	+0.76%

Volatility

HTD vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) is 2.66%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that HTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTD	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	3.37%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	8.56%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	9.95%	+2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.76%	13.08%	+4.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.62%	15.33%	+7.29%

HTD vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTD has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTD vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

HTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than CEFS's 7.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	7.10%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%	0.00%	0.00%
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund	7.43%	7.51%	7.52%	8.73%	7.36%	5.80%	7.97%	6.06%	10.09%	8.85%	7.30%	7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTD and CEFS in my portfolio?

HTD and CEFS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HTD or CEFS?

CEFS has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to HTD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTD dropped -69.79% vs CEFS's -38.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.