HTAX vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

HTAX (Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTAX is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Nomura, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. HTAX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

HTAX vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HTAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 4.52%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 9.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -9.18%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTAX vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HTAX Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF	2.66%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HTAX and BPH is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.18

Return for Risk

HTAX vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTAX

HTAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
HTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
HTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
HTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
HTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAX vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HTAX	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	—	—

Drawdowns

HTAX vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAX drawdown since its inception was -6.10%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -12.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAX and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTAX	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-12.06%	+5.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.06%	+12.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-3.99%	+2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HTAX	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.70%	25.57%	-20.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.41%	25.57%	-19.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.41%	25.57%	-19.16%

HTAX vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTAX vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

HTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than BPH's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.55%	0.00%
HTAX Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF	4.43%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTAX and BPH in my portfolio?

HTAX and BPH have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTAX or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTAX or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HTAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HTAX or BPH?

HTAX has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.55% for BPH.

What is the main difference between HTAX and BPH?

HTAX is categorized as High Yield Muni, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTAX and 0.19% for BPH.