HST vs. CLILF
HST (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) and CLILF (CapitaLand Investment Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — HST in REIT - Hotel & Motel, CLILF in Real Estate - Services. Over the past 3 years, HST returned 18.78%/yr vs -5.11%/yr for CLILF. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HST vs. CLILF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HST achieves a 41.88% return, which is significantly higher than CLILF's 6.49% return.
HST
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 16.42%
- YTD
- 41.88%
- 6M
- 39.68%
- 1Y
- 72.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
CLILF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 33.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- -5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HST vs. CLILF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 41.88% | 7.21% | -5.48% | 27.61% | -4.62% | 3.82% |
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 6.49% | -3.06% | -1.09% | -23.92% | 6.00% | -1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HST and CLILF is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
HST:
$1.94
CLILF:
SGD 0.05
HST:
12.81
CLILF:
52.17
HST:
2.10
CLILF:
3.93
HST:
$6.17B
CLILF:
SGD 2.91B
HST:
$1.56B
CLILF:
SGD 2.22B
HST:
$1.95B
CLILF:
SGD 153.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HST vs. CLILF — Risk / Return Rank
HST
CLILF
HST vs. CLILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HST | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.26 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.15 | 0.52 | +6.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.91 | 1.03 | +17.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HST vs. CLILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HST drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than CLILF's maximum drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HST and CLILF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HST | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.26% | -66.07% | -29.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -29.26% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.03% | -45.96% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -53.74% | +53.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.02% | -44.07% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 14.66% | -11.08% |
Volatility
HST vs. CLILF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) is 6.62%, while CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that HST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HST | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 10.69% | -4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.18% | 54.59% | -37.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.48% | 62.76% | -38.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 79.89% | -49.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.20% | 79.89% | -45.69% |
Dividends
HST vs. CLILF - Dividend Comparison
HST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than CLILF's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 3.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 3.82% | 5.36% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 3.30% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 4.58% | 5.10% | 4.28% | 4.51% | 5.22% |
Financials
HST vs. CLILF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and CapitaLand Investment Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HST vs. CLILF - Profitability Comparison
HST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLILF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
HST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 319.00M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
CLILF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
HST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 494.00M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 30.0%.
CLILF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HST and CLILF have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLILF has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to HST (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HST dropped -95.26% vs CLILF's -66.07%.
HST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HST and CLILF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer