PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLILF vs. CURB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLILF vs. CURB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Curbline Properties Corp (CURB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLILF achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than CURB's 33.61% return.


CLILF

1D
0.00%
1M
9.29%
6M
-15.99%
YTD
6.92%
1Y
-1.11%
3Y*
-9.56%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.31%

CURB

1D
0.20%
1M
0.99%
6M
27.88%
YTD
33.61%
1Y
43.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.46K$45.25K$31.59K
$43.81M$42.39M$35.63M

CLILF vs. CURB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
6.92%-3.06%-14.05%
CURB
Curbline Properties Corp
33.61%2.93%14.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CLILF and CURB is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLILF:

$9.98B

CURB:

$3.52B

EPS

CLILF:

SGD 0.06

CURB:

$0.30

PE Ratio

CLILF:

45.42

CURB:

102.45

PS Ratio

CLILF:

3.42

CURB:

16.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 2.91B

CURB:

$202.19M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 2.22B

CURB:

$151.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 153.89M

CURB:

$136.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLILF vs. CURB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLILF
CLILF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CLILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLILF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CLILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLILF Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CURB
CURB Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CURB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CURB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURB Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLILF vs. CURB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Curbline Properties Corp (CURB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLILFCURBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

4.47

-4.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

11.01

-11.08

CLILF vs. CURB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLILF Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the CURB Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLILF and CURB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLILF vs. CURB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLILF drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, which is greater than CURB's maximum drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLILF and CURB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLILFCURBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-14.18%

-51.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.27%

-9.54%

-25.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.56%

-3.50%

-50.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.41%

-5.07%

-39.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.80%

3.87%

+13.93%

Volatility

CLILF vs. CURB - Volatility Comparison

CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a higher volatility of 18.18% compared to Curbline Properties Corp (CURB) at 6.42%. This indicates that CLILF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CURB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLILFCURBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.18%

6.42%

+11.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.94%

15.72%

+28.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.01%

20.70%

+44.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.35%

28.49%

+50.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.35%

28.49%

+50.86%

Dividends

CLILF vs. CURB - Dividend Comparison

CLILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than CURB's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
3.67%0.00%0.00%
CURB
Curbline Properties Corp
2.25%2.89%1.08%

Financials

CLILF vs. CURB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CapitaLand Investment Limited and Curbline Properties Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CLILF vs. CURB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CapitaLand Investment Limited and Curbline Properties Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CLILF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

CURB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported a gross profit of 42.90M and revenue of 57.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.0%.

CLILF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

CURB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported an operating income of 7.62M and revenue of 57.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

CLILF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.

CURB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curbline Properties Corp reported a net income of 3.56M and revenue of 57.99M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLILF and CURB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLILF has higher volatility (18.18%) compared to CURB (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLILF dropped -66.07% vs CURB's -14.18%.

CURB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLILF and CURB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer