HSRT vs. HFGO
HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSRT is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLOIE AAA Index, while HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford. HSRT is passively managed, while HFGO is actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSRT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HFGO.
Performance
HSRT vs. HFGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HSRT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFGO
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 30.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSRT vs. HFGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 6.44% | 7.52% | -4.40% | 0.13% |
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 11.58% | 15.52% | 40.73% | 42.45% | -36.69% | -5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSRT and HFGO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.24 |
The correlation between HSRT and HFGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSRT vs. HFGO — Risk / Return Rank
HSRT
HFGO
HSRT vs. HFGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSRT | HFGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.39 | — |
Drawdowns
HSRT vs. HFGO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSRT | HFGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -44.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.36% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.11% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.67% | — |
Volatility
HSRT vs. HFGO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSRT | HFGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.01% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 25.91% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 25.91% | — |
HSRT vs. HFGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than HFGO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSRT vs. HFGO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HSRT nor HFGO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 1.29% | 6.37% | 3.98% | 2.67% | 2.23% | 2.88% | 3.50% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSRT and HFGO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.
HSRT and HFGO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
HSRT is categorized as CLO, while HFGO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.60% for HFGO.
Find the right allocation for HSRT and HFGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer