HSPGX vs. NESGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX).
HSPGX is managed by Emerald. It was launched on Oct 1, 1992. NESGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on May 22, 2002.
Performance
HSPGX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HSPGX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | -0.71% | 31.62% | 28.04% | 18.66% | -24.65% | 3.59% | 38.49% | 28.33% | -12.16% | 27.72% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 15.34% | 10.50% | 12.76% | 5.68% | -30.21% | 10.59% | 71.90% | 54.42% | -5.43% | 11.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSPGX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 15.34% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPGX has underperformed NESGX with an annualized return of 13.73%, while NESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.
HSPGX
- 1D
- 5.53%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 49.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
NESGX
- 1D
- 5.32%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 15.34%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 55.17%
- 3Y*
- 12.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSPGX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HSPGX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank
HSPGX
NESGX
HSPGX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSPGX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.58 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 2.17 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.11 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 10.44 | +0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSPGX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.58 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.04 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.52 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPGX and NESGX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HSPGX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison
HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, while NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 12.83% | 12.74% | 21.85% | 6.43% | 8.77% | 19.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 11.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.16% | 25.09% | 13.69% | 8.43% | 22.26% | 8.94% | 6.67% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
HSPGX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, which is greater than NESGX's maximum drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and NESGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSPGX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.28% | -50.29% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.38% | -17.27% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.65% | -50.05% | +11.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -50.29% | +8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -4.31% | -5.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -11.74% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 5.14% | -1.19% |
Volatility
HSPGX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) is 11.36%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a volatility of 12.14%. This indicates that HSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HSPGX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.36% | 12.14% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.12% | 23.43% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.18% | 35.37% | -6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.26% | 29.13% | -3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 25.56% | -0.58% |