HSPGX vs. MSSCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) and MSSCX (AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HSPGX returned 17.32%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for MSSCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSPGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for MSSCX.

Performance

HSPGX vs. MSSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPGX achieves a 34.80% return, which is significantly higher than MSSCX's 24.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HSPGX having a 17.32% annualized return and MSSCX not far behind at 17.15%.

HSPGX

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: 10.18%
• YTD: 34.80%
• 6M: 30.34%
• 1Y: 74.36%
• 3Y*: 35.13%
• 5Y*: 14.66%
• 10Y*: 17.32%

MSSCX

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 3.90%
• YTD: 24.13%
• 6M: 22.06%
• 1Y: 40.65%
• 3Y*: 15.58%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: 17.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPGX vs. MSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	34.80%	31.62%	28.04%	18.66%	-24.65%	3.59%	38.49%	28.33%	-12.16%	27.72%
MSSCX AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund	24.13%	7.63%	10.88%	23.41%	-21.47%	16.33%	39.13%	46.03%	2.22%	21.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPGX and MSSCX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 1997	0.91

The correlation between HSPGX and MSSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HSPGX vs. MSSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPGX

HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MSSCX

MSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 51
MSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPGX vs. MSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSPGX	MSSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	1.64	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	2.18	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.28	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.38	3.94	+1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.46	11.79	+10.67

HSPGX vs. MSSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the MSSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPGX and MSSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSPGX vs. MSSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, smaller than the maximum MSSCX drawdown of -78.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and MSSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSPGX	MSSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.28%	-78.46%	+18.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-10.80%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.63%	-33.02%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.65%	-33.02%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.48%	-46.70%	+5.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.98%	-28.16%	+9.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	3.59%	-0.16%

Volatility

HSPGX vs. MSSCX - Volatility Comparison

Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX) at 8.53%. This indicates that HSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSPGX	MSSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.24%	8.53%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.44%	19.76%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.53%	26.04%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.71%	26.50%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.25%	26.55%	-1.30%

HSPGX vs. MSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than MSSCX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSPGX vs. MSSCX - Dividend Comparison

HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, while MSSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	9.45%	12.74%	21.85%	6.43%	8.77%	19.11%	8.48%	1.45%	11.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSSCX AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	9.23%	1.14%	0.00%	43.52%	3.34%	17.24%	59.21%	27.92%	0.43%	28.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSPGX and MSSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, HSPGX and MSSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HSPGX or MSSCX?

HSPGX has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to MSSCX (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSPGX dropped -60.28% vs MSSCX's -78.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.