PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPGX vs. FTXSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPGX vs. FTXSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPGX achieves a 34.80% return, which is significantly lower than FTXSX's 39.93% return.


HSPGX

1D
1.23%
1M
10.18%
YTD
34.80%
6M
30.34%
1Y
74.36%
3Y*
35.13%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
17.32%

FTXSX

1D
1.68%
1M
7.19%
YTD
39.93%
6M
36.92%
1Y
72.37%
3Y*
32.67%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPGX vs. FTXSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
34.80%31.62%28.04%18.66%-24.65%3.59%38.49%28.33%-14.83%
FTXSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund
39.93%12.44%28.86%33.15%-27.48%25.50%51.32%19.19%-3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPGX and FTXSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.91

The correlation between HSPGX and FTXSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPGX vs. FTXSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPGX
HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXSX
FTXSX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FTXSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPGX vs. FTXSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSPGXFTXSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.42

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

5.92

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.46

23.33

-0.87

HSPGX vs. FTXSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the FTXSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPGX and FTXSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSPGX vs. FTXSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, which is greater than FTXSX's maximum drawdown of -45.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and FTXSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPGXFTXSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.28%

-45.03%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

-12.37%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.63%

-32.37%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.65%

-39.58%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.98%

-12.41%

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.13%

+0.30%

Volatility

HSPGX vs. FTXSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) is 9.24%, while FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that HSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPGXFTXSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

9.73%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.44%

21.68%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.53%

27.41%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

26.98%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.25%

27.75%

-2.50%

HSPGX vs. FTXSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXSX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSPGX vs. FTXSX - Dividend Comparison

HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, while FTXSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FTXSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%17.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
9.45%12.74%21.85%6.43%8.77%19.11%8.48%1.45%11.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, HSPGX and FTXSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTXSX has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to HSPGX (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSPGX dropped -60.28% vs FTXSX's -45.03%.

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPGX and FTXSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer