PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPGX vs. AASOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPGX vs. AASOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPGX achieves a 23.46% return, which is significantly higher than AASOX's 18.35% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPGX has outperformed AASOX with an annualized return of 15.52%, while AASOX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.


HSPGX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-7.36%
6M
15.71%
YTD
23.46%
1Y
51.54%
3Y*
27.87%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
15.52%
ALL TIME*
10.94%

AASOX

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.41%
6M
15.62%
YTD
18.35%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
-2.65%
10Y*
9.09%
ALL TIME*
6.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HSPGX vs. AASOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
23.46%31.62%28.04%18.66%-24.65%3.59%38.49%28.33%-12.16%27.72%
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
18.35%5.89%8.12%16.49%-38.39%-5.07%67.18%29.36%1.47%28.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPGX and AASOX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1992

0.88

The correlation between HSPGX and AASOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPGX vs. AASOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HSPGX
HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

AASOX
AASOX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HSPGX vs. AASOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSPGXAASOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

1.67

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

5.48

+6.50

HSPGX vs. AASOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the AASOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPGX and AASOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSPGX vs. AASOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, smaller than the maximum AASOX drawdown of -74.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and AASOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPGXAASOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.28%

-74.54%

+14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.41%

-18.34%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.63%

-32.82%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.65%

-60.50%

+21.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

-60.50%

+19.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.56%

-32.71%

+22.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-29.87%

+10.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

5.59%

-1.47%

Volatility

HSPGX vs. AASOX - Volatility Comparison

Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a higher volatility of 8.20% compared to Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) at 7.56%. This indicates that HSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AASOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPGXAASOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.20%

7.56%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.56%

19.63%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.62%

24.31%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.89%

40.53%

-14.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.30%

33.54%

-8.24%

HSPGX vs. AASOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than AASOX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSPGX vs. AASOX - Dividend Comparison

HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, more than AASOX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
0.99%1.17%0.38%0.00%22.43%49.73%6.88%5.59%4.58%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
10.32%12.74%21.85%6.43%8.77%19.11%8.48%1.45%11.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HSPGX and AASOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HSPGX has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to AASOX (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSPGX dropped -60.28% vs AASOX's -74.54%.

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPGX and AASOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer