PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSMV vs. SMLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSMV vs. SMLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMLF's 14.46% return.


HSMV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.06%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

SMLF

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.07%
YTD
14.46%
6M
14.20%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSMV vs. SMLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
3.11%1.57%13.17%5.01%-9.44%23.72%34.70%
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
14.46%12.30%16.33%19.99%-12.19%26.53%55.95%

Correlation

The correlation between HSMV and SMLF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between HSMV and SMLF has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HSMV vs. SMLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSMV
SMLF

Real Estate

23.8%
5.7%

Financial Services

16.6%
15.0%

Industrials

15.0%
19.8%

Utilities

11.9%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
11.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%
4.6%

Healthcare

4.9%
12.7%

Energy

2.8%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.2%

Technology

1.7%
16.6%

Real Estate

HSMV
23.8%
SMLF
5.7%

Financial Services

HSMV
16.6%
SMLF
15.0%

Industrials

HSMV
15.0%
SMLF
19.8%

Utilities

HSMV
11.9%
SMLF
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

HSMV
7.9%
SMLF
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HSMV
7.8%
SMLF
11.8%

Basic Materials

HSMV
5.4%
SMLF
4.6%

Healthcare

HSMV
4.9%
SMLF
12.7%

Energy

HSMV
2.8%
SMLF
4.8%

Communication Services

HSMV
2.3%
SMLF
3.2%

Technology

HSMV
1.7%
SMLF
16.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSMV vs. SMLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSMV
HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLF
SMLF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SMLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSMV vs. SMLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSMVSMLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.31

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

3.57

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

12.27

-10.64

HSMV vs. SMLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the SMLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSMV and SMLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSMVSMLFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

1.81

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.52

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.54

+0.14

Drawdowns

HSMV vs. SMLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum SMLF drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and SMLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSMVSMLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-41.89%

+22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-8.71%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-26.28%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-26.28%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-0.72%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-6.60%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.53%

+0.06%

Volatility

HSMV vs. SMLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) is 2.85%, while iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that HSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSMVSMLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

4.80%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

12.31%

-5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

17.21%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

21.09%

-6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

21.78%

-5.72%

HSMV vs. SMLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSMV vs. SMLF - Dividend Comparison

HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than SMLF's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
2.00%2.01%1.43%1.43%1.26%0.76%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
1.03%1.14%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.33%1.39%1.17%0.93%0.78%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSMV and SMLF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLF has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to HSMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSMV dropped -19.16% vs SMLF's -41.89%.

On 5-year performance, SMLF leads with 10.89% vs 3.69% for HSMV. On fees, SMLF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 10.89% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.

HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.03% for SMLF.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 0.30% for SMLF.

SMLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSMV and SMLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer