PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSMV vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSMV vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


HSMV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.06%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSMV vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
3.11%1.57%13.17%5.01%-9.44%23.72%34.70%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%35.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HSMV and KNG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020

0.88

The correlation between HSMV and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSMV vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSMV
KNG

Real Estate

23.8%
4.4%

Financial Services

16.6%
12.7%

Industrials

15.0%
20.3%

Utilities

11.9%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
5.5%

Basic Materials

5.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

4.9%
10.1%

Energy

2.8%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.3%

-

Technology

1.7%
4.3%

Real Estate

HSMV
23.8%
KNG
4.4%

Financial Services

HSMV
16.6%
KNG
12.7%

Industrials

HSMV
15.0%
KNG
20.3%

Utilities

HSMV
11.9%
KNG
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

HSMV
7.9%
KNG
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HSMV
7.8%
KNG
5.5%

Basic Materials

HSMV
5.4%
KNG
10.2%

Healthcare

HSMV
4.9%
KNG
10.1%

Energy

HSMV
2.8%
KNG
3.0%

Communication Services

HSMV
2.3%
KNG

-

Technology

HSMV
1.7%
KNG
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSMV vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSMV
HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSMV vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSMVKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.13

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

2.25

-0.63

HSMV vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSMV and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSMVKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

0.73

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.32

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.49

+0.18

Drawdowns

HSMV vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSMVKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-35.12%

+15.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-8.61%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-14.24%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-18.20%

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-5.89%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-4.13%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.32%

-0.73%

Volatility

HSMV vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that HSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSMVKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.29%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

7.39%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

10.19%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

13.59%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

17.18%

-1.12%

HSMV vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSMV vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
2.00%2.01%1.43%1.43%1.26%0.76%0.80%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSMV and KNG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSMV has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSMV dropped -19.16% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, KNG leads with 4.31% vs 3.69% for HSMV. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KNG has performed better with a 4.31% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 2.00% for HSMV.

HSMV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 0.75% for KNG.

KNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSMV and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer