HSHP vs. GDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HSHP (Himalaya Shipping Ltd.) is a stock, while GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Over the past 3 years, HSHP returned 45.05%/yr vs 41.00%/yr for GDX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HSHP vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSHP achieves a 61.64% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return.

HSHP

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 2.39%
• YTD: 61.64%
• 6M: 48.14%
• 1Y: 153.83%
• 3Y*: 45.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDX

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: -0.76%
• YTD: -0.90%
• 6M: 5.62%
• 1Y: 61.27%
• 3Y*: 41.00%
• 5Y*: 18.69%
• 10Y*: 13.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSHP vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd.	61.64%	96.10%	-23.53%	37.12%	-1.96%
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF	-0.90%	154.77%	10.63%	9.98%	19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between HSHP and GDX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022	0.18

Return for Risk

HSHP vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSHP

HSHP Risk / Return Rank: 96
HSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
HSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 96

GDX

GDX Risk / Return Rank: 35
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSHP vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HSHP	GDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.92	1.35	+2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.18	1.76	+2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.25	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.94	2.00	+7.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.09	5.13	+17.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSHP vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSHP Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSHP and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSHP	GDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92	1.35	+2.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.13	+0.79

Drawdowns

HSHP vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSHP drawdown since its inception was -51.51%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSHP and GDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSHP	GDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.51%	-80.34%	+28.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.57%	-30.84%	+15.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.51%	-30.84%	-20.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.51%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.66%	-26.62%	+15.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.82%	-40.43%	+25.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.69%	11.99%	-5.30%

Volatility

HSHP vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) has a higher volatility of 16.82% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 15.40%. This indicates that HSHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSHP	GDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.82%	15.40%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.63%	37.50%	-5.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.58%	45.49%	-5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.63%	36.39%	+6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.63%	37.18%	+5.45%

Dividends

HSHP vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

HSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF	0.74%	0.74%	1.19%	1.61%	1.66%	1.67%	0.53%	0.67%	0.50%	0.76%	0.26%	0.85%
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd.	4.04%	3.57%	9.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSHP and GDX in my portfolio?

HSHP and GDX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSHP or GDX?

HSHP has higher volatility (16.82%) compared to GDX (15.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSHP dropped -51.51% vs GDX's -80.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.