PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSHP vs. COR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HSHP vs. COR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and Cencora Inc. (COR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSHP achieves a 61.64% return, which is significantly higher than COR's -21.63% return.


HSHP

1D
-1.91%
1M
2.39%
YTD
61.64%
6M
48.14%
1Y
153.83%
3Y*
45.05%
5Y*
10Y*

COR

1D
-0.45%
1M
-12.98%
YTD
-21.63%
6M
-21.06%
1Y
-8.89%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
16.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSHP vs. COR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
61.64%96.10%-23.53%37.12%-1.96%
COR
Cencora Inc.
-21.63%51.48%10.37%25.33%8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HSHP and COR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022

0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HSHP:

$675.17M

COR:

$51.51B

EPS

HSHP:

$0.63

COR:

$13.07

PE Ratio

HSHP:

22.89

COR:

20.17

PEG Ratio

HSHP:

0.04

COR:

9.58

PS Ratio

HSHP:

4.64

COR:

0.16

PB Ratio

HSHP:

4.33

COR:

15.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

HSHP:

$143.50M

COR:

$328.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HSHP:

$98.40M

COR:

$11.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

HSHP:

$101.44M

COR:

$3.64B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSHP vs. COR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSHP
HSHP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

COR
COR Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
COR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
COR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
COR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
COR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSHP vs. COR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and Cencora Inc. (COR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSHPCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

0.97

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.94

-0.28

+10.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.09

-0.82

+23.91

HSHP vs. COR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSHP Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the COR Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSHP and COR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSHPCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92

-0.30

+4.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.54

+0.38

Drawdowns

HSHP vs. COR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSHP drawdown since its inception was -51.51%, smaller than the maximum COR drawdown of -71.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSHP and COR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSHPCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.51%

-71.01%

+19.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-32.44%

+16.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.51%

-32.44%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.66%

-29.37%

+18.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-13.62%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

10.87%

-4.18%

Volatility

HSHP vs. COR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) is 16.82%, while Cencora Inc. (COR) has a volatility of 20.43%. This indicates that HSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSHPCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.82%

20.43%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.63%

27.13%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.58%

30.05%

+9.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.63%

22.30%

+20.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.63%

27.47%

+15.16%

Dividends

HSHP vs. COR - Dividend Comparison

HSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than COR's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COR
Cencora Inc.
0.89%0.67%0.93%0.96%1.13%5.13%6.74%7.48%2.07%1.61%1.77%1.17%
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
4.04%3.57%9.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HSHP vs. COR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Himalaya Shipping Ltd. and Cencora Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.60M
78.36B
(HSHP) Total Revenue
(COR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HSHP vs. COR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Himalaya Shipping Ltd. and Cencora Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
54.8%
4.6%
Portfolio components
HSHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a gross profit of 18.40M and revenue of 33.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.8%.

COR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.

HSHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.2%.

COR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

HSHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a net income of 5.00M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

COR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HSHP and COR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COR has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to HSHP (16.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSHP dropped -51.51% vs COR's -71.01%.

HSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSHP and COR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer