HSCZ vs. IVV
HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ returned 12.54%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for IVV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSCZ charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
HSCZ vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 12.54%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
HSCZ
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
IVV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
HSCZ vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 10.35% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | -11.46% | 17.75% | 6.40% | 27.89% | -13.99% | 24.52% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.20% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSCZ and IVV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.70 |
The correlation between HSCZ and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSCZ vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSCZ
IVV
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
HSCZ
IVV
Financial Services
HSCZ
IVV
Technology
HSCZ
IVV
Real Estate
HSCZ
IVV
Basic Materials
HSCZ
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
HSCZ
IVV
Energy
HSCZ
IVV
Healthcare
HSCZ
IVV
Consumer Defensive
HSCZ
IVV
Communication Services
HSCZ
IVV
Utilities
HSCZ
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSCZ vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
HSCZ
IVV
HSCZ vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSCZ | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.68 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.32 | 11.98 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSCZ vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSCZ | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -55.25% | +20.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -8.89% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -18.75% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -24.53% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | -33.90% | -0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -3.14% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -10.76% | +6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 1.99% | +0.26% |
Volatility
HSCZ vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 3.94%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSCZ | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 4.88% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 9.85% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 12.48% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 16.98% | -3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 18.07% | -2.60% |
HSCZ vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSCZ vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.95% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSCZ and IVV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to HSCZ (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.58% vs 12.54% for HSCZ. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 12.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.
HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 1.11% for IVV.
HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.03% for IVV.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSCZ and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer