HSCZ vs. HLI
HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while HLI (Houlihan Lokey, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ returned 12.35%/yr vs 21.76%/yr for HLI. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HSCZ vs. HLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than HLI's -20.15% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ has underperformed HLI with an annualized return of 12.35%, while HLI has yielded a comparatively higher 21.76% annualized return.
HSCZ
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
HLI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -20.15%
- 6M
- -22.50%
- 1Y
- -18.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- 21.76%
HSCZ vs. HLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 10.99% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | -11.46% | 17.75% | 6.40% | 27.89% | -13.99% | 24.52% |
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | -20.15% | 1.64% | 47.04% | 40.67% | -13.88% | 57.04% | 40.61% | 36.33% | -17.20% | 49.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSCZ and HLI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2015 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSCZ vs. HLI — Risk / Return Rank
HSCZ
HLI
HSCZ vs. HLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSCZ | HLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.88 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | -0.59 | +3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | -1.12 | +13.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSCZ vs. HLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, roughly equal to the maximum HLI drawdown of -36.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and HLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSCZ | HLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -36.57% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -34.38% | +24.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -34.38% | +21.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -36.57% | +16.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | -36.57% | +1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -33.28% | +32.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -9.59% | +4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 18.07% | -15.82% |
Volatility
HSCZ vs. HLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 4.08%, while Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSCZ | HLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 8.26% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 19.38% | -9.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 26.11% | -14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 27.97% | -14.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 26.89% | -11.21% |
Dividends
HSCZ vs. HLI - Dividend Comparison
HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than HLI's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | 1.81% | 1.36% | 1.30% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 1.56% | 1.90% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 0.57% |
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.93% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSCZ and HLI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLI has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to HSCZ (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs HLI's -36.57%.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSCZ and HLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer