PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSCYX vs. NEAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSCYX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Hartford Small Company Fund (HSCYX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSCYX achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than NEAGX's 59.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCYX has underperformed NEAGX with an annualized return of 12.50%, while NEAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.51% annualized return.


HSCYX

1D
0.31%
1M
3.66%
YTD
9.90%
6M
8.93%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
12.50%

NEAGX

1D
3.25%
1M
17.09%
YTD
59.55%
6M
61.01%
1Y
96.36%
3Y*
38.65%
5Y*
23.60%
10Y*
22.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSCYX vs. NEAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSCYX
The Hartford Small Company Fund
9.90%12.82%11.70%16.35%-31.17%1.24%54.62%44.00%-4.49%25.76%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
59.55%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between HSCYX and NEAGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001

0.86

The correlation between HSCYX and NEAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSCYX vs. NEAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSCYX
HSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
HSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSCYX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hartford Small Company Fund (HSCYX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSCYXNEAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.59

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

7.20

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

29.00

-20.28

HSCYX vs. NEAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the NEAGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSCYX and NEAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSCYXNEAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

3.91

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.96

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.94

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.66

-0.25

Drawdowns

HSCYX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSCYX drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCYX and NEAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSCYXNEAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-41.80%

-19.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-14.01%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.93%

-28.49%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.19%

-36.31%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.85%

-36.31%

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

0.00%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.60%

-8.67%

-8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.47%

+0.02%

Volatility

HSCYX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Hartford Small Company Fund (HSCYX) is 5.07%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that HSCYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSCYXNEAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

10.14%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

20.45%

-7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

25.81%

-7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.12%

24.57%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

24.15%

-0.75%

HSCYX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSCYX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison

HSCYX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSCYX
The Hartford Small Company Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%20.12%7.19%9.52%19.43%0.00%0.00%12.96%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.34%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSCYX and NEAGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAGX has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to HSCYX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCYX dropped -61.55% vs NEAGX's -41.80%.

NEAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSCYX and NEAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer