HSAFX vs. CRDBX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

HSAFX (Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund) and CRDBX (Potomac Defensive Bull Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, HSAFX returned 2.88%/yr vs 15.30%/yr for CRDBX. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HSAFX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for CRDBX.

Performance

HSAFX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSAFX achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 22.60% return.

HSAFX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 2.77%
• 6M: 2.11%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 1Y: 3.76%
• 3Y*: 4.03%
• 5Y*: 2.88%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.95%

CRDBX

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: 2.48%
• 6M: 21.74%
• YTD: 22.60%
• 1Y: 34.45%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 15.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HSAFX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	2.00%	7.78%	1.74%	0.65%	4.42%	7.23%	7.00%
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund	22.60%	25.36%	19.91%	18.44%	-8.21%	28.08%	24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HSAFX and CRDBX is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020	0.06

The correlation between HSAFX and CRDBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HSAFX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HSAFX

HSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 15
HSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
HSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

CRDBX

CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 93
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HSAFX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSAFX	CRDBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	2.33	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	3.33	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.50	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	5.32	-4.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	16.00	-14.10

HSAFX vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSAFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSAFX and CRDBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSAFX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSAFX drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -28.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSAFX and CRDBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSAFX	CRDBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-28.12%	+22.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.34%	-7.13%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.34%	-16.15%	+10.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.34%	-28.12%	+22.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	0.00%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-6.44%	+4.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	2.37%	-0.16%

Volatility

HSAFX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) is 1.82%, while Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that HSAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSAFX	CRDBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	6.40%	-4.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.39%	12.74%	-8.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.95%	16.33%	-10.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.99%	20.05%	-15.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.19%	20.43%	-15.24%

HSAFX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSAFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSAFX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

HSAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than CRDBX's 12.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund	12.53%	15.36%	12.58%	9.91%	0.18%	25.05%	1.65%	0.00%
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	1.96%	1.90%	2.15%	1.60%	19.12%	3.37%	5.55%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSAFX and CRDBX in my portfolio?

HSAFX and CRDBX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSAFX or CRDBX?

CRDBX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to HSAFX (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSAFX dropped -5.54% vs CRDBX's -28.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.