HSAFX vs. ABRZX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HSAFX (Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund) and ABRZX (Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, HSAFX returned 1.74%/yr vs 4.19%/yr for ABRZX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSAFX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for ABRZX.

Performance

HSAFX vs. ABRZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSAFX achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly lower than ABRZX's 18.14% return.

HSAFX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: -3.59%
• 1Y: -1.11%
• 3Y*: 3.00%
• 5Y*: 1.74%
• 10Y*: —

ABRZX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 18.14%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 24.94%
• 3Y*: 10.68%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: 4.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSAFX vs. ABRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	-2.51%	7.78%	1.74%	0.65%	4.42%	7.23%	11.20%	-0.37%
ABRZX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A	18.14%	8.20%	3.14%	5.97%	-14.96%	9.36%	9.20%	-0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HSAFX and ABRZX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019	0.24

The correlation between HSAFX and ABRZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HSAFX vs. ABRZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSAFX

HSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 2
HSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ABRZX

ABRZX Risk / Return Rank: 89
ABRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ABRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ABRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ABRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ABRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSAFX vs. ABRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSAFX	ABRZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	2.71	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.13	3.58	-3.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.52	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	5.92	-6.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	19.45	-19.80

HSAFX vs. ABRZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSAFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the ABRZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSAFX and ABRZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSAFX vs. ABRZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSAFX drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum ABRZX drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSAFX and ABRZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSAFX	ABRZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-26.62%	+21.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.34%	-4.25%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.34%	-18.28%	+12.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.34%	-19.33%	+13.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-2.53%	-2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-4.74%	+3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.29%	+0.72%

Volatility

HSAFX vs. ABRZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) is 2.03%, while Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that HSAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSAFX	ABRZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.03%	3.04%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.06%	8.18%	-4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.80%	9.27%	-3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.90%	12.25%	-7.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.15%	10.92%	-5.77%

HSAFX vs. ABRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSAFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ABRZX's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSAFX vs. ABRZX - Dividend Comparison

HSAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than ABRZX's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABRZX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A	2.86%	3.38%	13.28%	2.21%	0.00%	26.02%	1.18%	6.49%	0.00%	6.43%	4.41%	6.91%
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	1.81%	1.90%	2.15%	1.60%	19.12%	3.37%	5.55%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSAFX and ABRZX in my portfolio?

HSAFX and ABRZX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSAFX or ABRZX?

ABRZX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to HSAFX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSAFX dropped -5.54% vs ABRZX's -26.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.