HRTVX vs. PCSVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HRTVX (Heartland Value Fund) and PCSVX (PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HRTVX returned 11.89%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for PCSVX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HRTVX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for PCSVX.

Performance

HRTVX vs. PCSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTVX achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than PCSVX's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, HRTVX has outperformed PCSVX with an annualized return of 11.89%, while PCSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.57% annualized return.

HRTVX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 20.07%
• 6M: 21.31%
• 1Y: 41.37%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 11.41%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

PCSVX

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 14.05%
• 6M: 14.28%
• 1Y: 27.50%
• 3Y*: 12.65%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRTVX vs. PCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund	20.07%	15.94%	15.76%	17.15%	-10.04%	21.86%	13.12%	17.93%	-12.10%	8.45%
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments	14.05%	4.33%	6.24%	12.57%	-13.44%	25.68%	12.13%	25.80%	-16.67%	9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between HRTVX and PCSVX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995	0.87

The correlation between HRTVX and PCSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HRTVX vs. PCSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTVX

HRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 79
HRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
HRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
HRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

PCSVX

PCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 50
PCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRTVX vs. PCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HRTVX	PCSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	1.94	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	2.92	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.33	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	3.32	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.84	9.99	+5.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HRTVX vs. PCSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the PCSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTVX and PCSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HRTVX	PCSVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	1.94	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.20	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.38	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.38	+0.21

Drawdowns

HRTVX vs. PCSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTVX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, roughly equal to the maximum PCSVX drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTVX and PCSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRTVX	PCSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.68%	-62.95%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-9.67%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.17%	-34.96%	+11.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.17%	-34.96%	+11.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.31%	-46.65%	+0.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-3.16%	+3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.04%	-10.58%	+1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.20%	-0.45%

Volatility

HRTVX vs. PCSVX - Volatility Comparison

Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRTVX	PCSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	4.57%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	11.67%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.83%	16.54%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.50%	22.36%	-2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.04%	22.99%	-1.95%

HRTVX vs. PCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTVX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PCSVX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

HRTVX vs. PCSVX - Dividend Comparison

HRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than PCSVX's 3.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HRTVX Heartland Value Fund	7.73%	9.29%	8.91%	5.65%	3.01%	13.50%	0.76%	3.12%	7.26%	6.43%	3.56%	8.25%
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments	3.11%	3.54%	18.45%	0.69%	22.49%	16.23%	0.61%	0.83%	7.14%	11.82%	2.62%	11.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HRTVX and PCSVX in my portfolio?

HRTVX and PCSVX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HRTVX or PCSVX?

PCSVX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to HRTVX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRTVX dropped -61.68% vs PCSVX's -62.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.