PCSVX vs. QGRPX
Compare and contrast key facts about PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX).
PCSVX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995. QGRPX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Jul 8, 2020.
Performance
PCSVX vs. QGRPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCSVX vs. QGRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments | 2.36% | 4.33% | 6.24% | 12.57% | -13.44% | 25.68% | 39.71% |
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | -11.21% | 15.51% | 25.13% | 35.52% | -25.57% | 29.14% | 14.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCSVX achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than QGRPX's -11.21% return.
PCSVX
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
QGRPX
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -11.21%
- 6M
- -10.79%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCSVX vs. QGRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCSVX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRPX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCSVX vs. QGRPX — Risk / Return Rank
PCSVX
QGRPX
PCSVX vs. QGRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCSVX | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.54 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 0.95 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.13 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.21 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.61 | 0.68 | +1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCSVX | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.54 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.51 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.63 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCSVX and QGRPX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PCSVX vs. QGRPX - Dividend Comparison
PCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than QGRPX's 6.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments | 3.46% | 3.54% | 18.45% | 0.69% | 22.49% | 16.23% | 0.61% | 0.83% | 7.14% | 11.82% | 2.62% | 11.87% |
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | 6.94% | 6.16% | 3.62% | 0.42% | 1.00% | 2.84% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCSVX vs. QGRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCSVX drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than QGRPX's maximum drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSVX and QGRPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCSVX | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -30.28% | -32.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.21% | -17.45% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -30.28% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.08% | -14.47% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -7.65% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 5.30% | -0.85% |
Volatility
PCSVX vs. QGRPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) is 5.51%, while UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that PCSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCSVX | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 6.13% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 11.43% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.60% | 21.16% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 19.60% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 19.43% | +3.54% |