PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRTVX vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRTVX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTVX achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HRTVX has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 11.89%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.


HRTVX

1D
0.94%
1M
2.89%
YTD
20.07%
6M
21.31%
1Y
41.37%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
11.89%

IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRTVX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRTVX
Heartland Value Fund
20.07%15.94%15.76%17.15%-10.04%21.86%13.12%17.93%-12.10%8.45%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HRTVX and IWM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2000

0.90

The correlation between HRTVX and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRTVX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTVX
HRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRTVX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRTVXIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

3.56

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.84

12.64

+3.20

HRTVX vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTVX and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRTVXIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.05

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.27

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.37

+0.23

Drawdowns

HRTVX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTVX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTVX and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRTVXIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.68%

-59.05%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-11.03%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-27.50%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.17%

-31.91%

+8.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.31%

-41.13%

-5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.49%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-10.77%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.10%

-0.35%

Volatility

HRTVX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Heartland Value Fund (HRTVX) is 4.54%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that HRTVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRTVXIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

5.75%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

13.53%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.83%

19.20%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

22.52%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.04%

23.04%

-2.00%

HRTVX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTVX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRTVX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

HRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRTVX
Heartland Value Fund
7.73%9.29%8.91%5.65%3.01%13.50%0.76%3.12%7.26%6.43%3.56%8.25%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRTVX and IWM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to HRTVX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRTVX dropped -61.68% vs IWM's -59.05%.

HRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRTVX and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer