HRSTX vs. MCN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HRSTX (Rational Tactical Return Fund) and MCN (XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund) are both Options Trading funds. Over the past 10 years, HRSTX returned 5.70%/yr vs 7.87%/yr for MCN. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HRSTX charges 1.99%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for MCN.

Performance

HRSTX vs. MCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRSTX achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly higher than MCN's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, HRSTX has underperformed MCN with an annualized return of 5.70%, while MCN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.87% annualized return.

HRSTX

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 8.02%
• 3Y*: 5.39%
• 5Y*: 5.10%
• 10Y*: 5.70%

MCN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.83%
• YTD: 2.18%
• 6M: 3.92%
• 1Y: 8.36%
• 3Y*: 2.80%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: 7.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRSTX vs. MCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HRSTX Rational Tactical Return Fund	5.82%	3.66%	3.23%	5.06%	5.90%	3.95%	2.65%	8.35%	9.66%	3.49%
MCN XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund	2.18%	0.66%	-1.52%	7.02%	6.32%	29.92%	15.25%	19.99%	-12.04%	9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HRSTX and MCN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2007	0.41

The correlation between HRSTX and MCN shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (5 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HRSTX vs. MCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRSTX

HRSTX Risk / Return Rank: 80
HRSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
HRSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HRSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
HRSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
HRSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MCN

MCN Risk / Return Rank: 11
MCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MCN Omega Ratio Rank: 9
MCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
MCN Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRSTX vs. MCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HRSTX	MCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	0.76	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	1.19	+2.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.13	+0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	0.97	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.53	3.02	+20.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HRSTX vs. MCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the MCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRSTX and MCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HRSTX	MCN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	0.76	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.54	0.20	+1.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.42	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.28	-0.24

Drawdowns

HRSTX vs. MCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRSTX drawdown since its inception was -69.69%, which is greater than MCN's maximum drawdown of -65.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSTX and MCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRSTX	MCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.69%	-65.11%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.42%	-8.62%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.42%	-24.47%	+22.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.42%	-24.47%	+22.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.82%	-38.79%	+22.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.83%	-4.46%	-4.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.59%	-9.56%	-22.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	2.78%	-2.44%

Volatility

HRSTX vs. MCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) is 1.39%, while XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that HRSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRSTX	MCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	1.99%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.42%	7.57%	-4.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.51%	10.99%	-7.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	18.27%	-14.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.16%	18.79%	-11.63%

HRSTX vs. MCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRSTX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MCN's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

HRSTX vs. MCN - Dividend Comparison

HRSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, less than MCN's 12.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HRSTX Rational Tactical Return Fund	8.94%	6.72%	4.47%	5.60%	2.24%	3.75%	2.10%	3.36%	1.33%	5.55%	13.80%	4.82%
MCN XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund	12.35%	12.00%	10.73%	9.56%	9.29%	8.98%	10.67%	10.86%	11.69%	9.33%	9.35%	9.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HRSTX and MCN in my portfolio?

HRSTX and MCN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HRSTX or MCN?

MCN has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to HRSTX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRSTX dropped -69.69% vs MCN's -65.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HRSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.