HRSTX vs. CIHEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX).
HRSTX is managed by Rational Funds. It was launched on Apr 30, 2007. CIHEX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014.
Performance
HRSTX vs. CIHEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HRSTX vs. CIHEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRSTX Rational Tactical Return Fund | -1.80% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 5.06% | 217.69% | 3.95% | 2.65% | 8.35% | 9.66% | 3.49% |
CIHEX Calamos Hedged Equity Fund | -3.54% | 11.36% | 14.96% | 15.88% | -11.11% | 13.31% | 9.66% | 14.47% | 0.87% | 8.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRSTX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly higher than CIHEX's -3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, HRSTX has outperformed CIHEX with an annualized return of 17.14%, while CIHEX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.62% annualized return.
HRSTX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- 1.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- 29.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.14%
CIHEX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- -3.54%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HRSTX vs. CIHEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRSTX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CIHEX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HRSTX vs. CIHEX — Risk / Return Rank
HRSTX
CIHEX
HRSTX vs. CIHEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRSTX | CIHEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.11 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 1.66 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.57 | -1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | 7.09 | -3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRSTX | CIHEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.11 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.76 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.82 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.73 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between HRSTX and CIHEX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HRSTX vs. CIHEX - Dividend Comparison
HRSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, more than CIHEX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRSTX Rational Tactical Return Fund | 8.48% | 6.72% | 4.47% | 5.60% | 2.24% | 3.75% | 2.10% | 3.36% | 1.33% | 5.55% | 13.80% | 4.82% |
CIHEX Calamos Hedged Equity Fund | 0.34% | 0.33% | 0.46% | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.44% | 1.03% | 0.99% | 3.16% | 0.85% | 1.29% | 1.69% |
Drawdowns
HRSTX vs. CIHEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRSTX drawdown since its inception was -69.69%, which is greater than CIHEX's maximum drawdown of -17.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSTX and CIHEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRSTX | CIHEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.69% | -17.80% | -51.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.42% | -5.82% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.42% | -15.77% | +13.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.82% | -17.80% | +1.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -4.68% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -2.34% | -25.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 1.29% | -0.97% |
Volatility
HRSTX vs. CIHEX - Volatility Comparison
Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX) have volatilities of 2.12% and 2.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HRSTX | CIHEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 2.12% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | 4.79% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 9.19% | -6.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.90% | 9.10% | +88.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.53% | 9.36% | +60.17% |