PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRSTX vs. GTSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRSTX vs. GTSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRSTX achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than GTSOX's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, HRSTX has underperformed GTSOX with an annualized return of 5.51%, while GTSOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.43% annualized return.


HRSTX

1D
1.42%
1M
0.02%
6M
5.86%
YTD
5.80%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
5.51%
ALL TIME*
0.64%

GTSOX

1D
1.10%
1M
0.95%
6M
6.54%
YTD
8.10%
1Y
14.89%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
7.43%
ALL TIME*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HRSTX vs. GTSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRSTX
Rational Tactical Return Fund
5.80%3.66%3.23%5.06%5.90%3.95%2.65%8.35%9.66%3.49%
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
8.10%7.73%13.79%14.59%-11.69%18.06%4.22%18.45%-4.68%5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HRSTX and GTSOX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.41

Over the past year, HRSTX and GTSOX have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRSTX vs. GTSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HRSTX
HRSTX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HRSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSOX
GTSOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GTSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HRSTX vs. GTSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRSTXGTSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.66

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.87

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

19.33

-7.79

HRSTX vs. GTSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the GTSOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRSTX and GTSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRSTX vs. GTSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRSTX drawdown since its inception was -69.69%, which is greater than GTSOX's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSTX and GTSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRSTXGTSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.69%

-29.21%

-40.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-5.05%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.09%

-22.03%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.09%

-22.03%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.82%

-29.21%

+13.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

0.00%

-8.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-2.94%

-28.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.75%

-0.12%

Volatility

HRSTX vs. GTSOX - Volatility Comparison

Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX) at 1.69%. This indicates that HRSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRSTXGTSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

1.69%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.79%

5.51%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.84%

5.96%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.93%

13.20%

-9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.09%

13.40%

-6.31%

HRSTX vs. GTSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRSTX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GTSOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRSTX vs. GTSOX - Dividend Comparison

HRSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.03%, less than GTSOX's 14.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
14.85%7.47%12.31%0.00%0.00%13.35%0.00%7.56%2.62%6.57%5.01%5.95%
HRSTX
Rational Tactical Return Fund
10.03%6.72%4.47%5.60%2.24%3.75%2.10%3.36%1.33%5.55%13.80%4.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRSTX and GTSOX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSTX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to GTSOX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRSTX dropped -69.69% vs GTSOX's -29.21%.

GTSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRSTX and GTSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer