MCN vs. GCPYX
Compare and contrast key facts about XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) and Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX).
MCN is managed by XAI. It was launched on Jan 1, 2015. GCPYX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
MCN vs. GCPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCN vs. GCPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCN XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund | 0.63% | 0.66% | -1.52% | 7.02% | 6.32% | 29.92% | 15.25% | 19.99% | -12.04% | 9.91% |
GCPYX Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund | -2.97% | 12.59% | 18.15% | 17.59% | -11.48% | 19.28% | 8.38% | 16.67% | -5.37% | 12.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCN achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly higher than GCPYX's -2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MCN has underperformed GCPYX with an annualized return of 8.06%, while GCPYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.87% annualized return.
MCN
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 7.53%
- 3Y*
- 0.58%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.06%
GCPYX
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCN vs. GCPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCN has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than GCPYX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCN vs. GCPYX — Risk / Return Rank
MCN
GCPYX
MCN vs. GCPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) and Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCN | GCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.99 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.62 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.25 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 1.68 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCN | GCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.99 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.73 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.73 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.67 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCN and GCPYX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MCN vs. GCPYX - Dividend Comparison
MCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, more than GCPYX's 0.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCN XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund | 12.29% | 12.00% | 10.73% | 9.56% | 9.29% | 8.98% | 10.67% | 10.86% | 11.69% | 9.33% | 9.35% | 9.76% |
GCPYX Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.73% | 0.92% | 0.96% | 0.47% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.12% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
MCN vs. GCPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCN drawdown since its inception was -65.11%, which is greater than GCPYX's maximum drawdown of -25.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCN and GCPYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCN | GCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.11% | -25.24% | -39.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -10.62% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.47% | -18.33% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.79% | -25.24% | -13.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -4.59% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -2.85% | -6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 4.04% | -0.12% |
Volatility
MCN vs. GCPYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) is 3.95%, while Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that MCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCN | GCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 4.37% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 7.40% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.57% | 15.89% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 12.31% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 12.45% | +6.40% |