PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRNOX vs. FBCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hood River New Opportunities Fund Institutional Class (HRNOX) and Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRNOX achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly higher than FBCKX's 18.59% return.


HRNOX

1D
0.77%
1M
9.60%
YTD
31.49%
6M
32.75%
1Y
82.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBCKX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.11%
YTD
18.59%
6M
19.80%
1Y
45.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HRNOX and FBCKX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2024

0.77

The correlation between HRNOX and FBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRNOX vs. FBCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRNOX
HRNOX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HRNOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRNOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRNOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HRNOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRNOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCKX
FBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hood River New Opportunities Fund Institutional Class (HRNOX) and Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRNOXFBCKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.16

2.67

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

3.42

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.39

3.68

+2.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

27.36

15.61

+11.75

HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRNOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is comparable to the FBCKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRNOX and FBCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRNOXFBCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

2.67

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.09

1.25

+0.84

Drawdowns

HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRNOX drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, which is greater than FBCKX's maximum drawdown of -27.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRNOX and FBCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRNOXFBCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-27.06%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-12.63%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

0.00%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-4.04%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.97%

+0.15%

Volatility

HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Volatility Comparison

Hood River New Opportunities Fund Institutional Class (HRNOX) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) at 4.14%. This indicates that HRNOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRNOXFBCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

4.14%

+4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.39%

13.00%

+8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.10%

17.43%

+9.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.92%

23.92%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.92%

23.92%

+5.00%

HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRNOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCKX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Dividend Comparison

HRNOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HRNOX and FBCKX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRNOX has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to FBCKX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRNOX dropped -31.44% vs FBCKX's -27.06%.

HRNOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRNOX and FBCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer