HRNOX vs. FBCKX
HRNOX (Hood River New Opportunities Fund Institutional Class) and FBCKX (Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past year, HRNOX returned 82.39% vs 45.08% for FBCKX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HRNOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FBCKX.
Performance
HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRNOX achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly higher than FBCKX's 18.59% return.
HRNOX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- 31.49%
- 6M
- 32.75%
- 1Y
- 82.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBCKX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 6M
- 19.80%
- 1Y
- 45.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HRNOX Hood River New Opportunities Fund Institutional Class | 31.49% | 35.76% | 4.77% |
FBCKX Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z | 18.59% | 19.99% | 7.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HRNOX and FBCKX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between HRNOX and FBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HRNOX vs. FBCKX — Risk / Return Rank
HRNOX
FBCKX
HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hood River New Opportunities Fund Institutional Class (HRNOX) and Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRNOX | FBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.16 | 2.67 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.79 | 3.42 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.39 | 3.68 | +2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.36 | 15.61 | +11.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRNOX | FBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16 | 2.67 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.09 | 1.25 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRNOX drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, which is greater than FBCKX's maximum drawdown of -27.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRNOX and FBCKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRNOX | FBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.44% | -27.06% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -12.63% | -0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | 0.00% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -4.04% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.97% | +0.15% |
Volatility
HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Volatility Comparison
Hood River New Opportunities Fund Institutional Class (HRNOX) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) at 4.14%. This indicates that HRNOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HRNOX | FBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 4.14% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.39% | 13.00% | +8.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.10% | 17.43% | +9.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 23.92% | +5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 23.92% | +5.00% |
HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRNOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCKX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
HRNOX vs. FBCKX - Dividend Comparison
HRNOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FBCKX Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.12% |
HRNOX Hood River New Opportunities Fund Institutional Class | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HRNOX and FBCKX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HRNOX has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to FBCKX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRNOX dropped -31.44% vs FBCKX's -27.06%.
HRNOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HRNOX and FBCKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer