HRMDX vs. VMFVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX).
HRMDX is managed by Heartland. It was launched on Oct 31, 2014. VMFVX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 2, 2010.
Performance
HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund | 4.09% | 0.12% | 3.68% | 13.37% | -3.09% | 28.13% | 6.93% | 25.30% | -8.58% | 8.14% |
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.00% | 7.57% | 10.59% | 16.49% | -7.03% | 30.54% | 3.68% | 26.18% | -11.90% | 12.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRMDX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 1.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HRMDX having a 9.72% annualized return and VMFVX not far ahead at 10.07%.
HRMDX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 3.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
VMFVX
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 12.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HRMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HRMDX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank
HRMDX
VMFVX
HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HRMDX | VMFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 0.63 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 1.03 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.14 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.91 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 3.44 | -2.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HRMDX | VMFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.63 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.37 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.46 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.50 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between HRMDX and VMFVX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison
HRMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than VMFVX's 1.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.09% | 2.17% | 5.93% | 1.93% | 5.45% | 23.95% | 0.44% | 2.26% | 9.68% | 6.60% | 0.69% | 1.80% |
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.86% | 1.88% | 1.81% | 1.58% | 2.04% | 1.81% | 2.48% | 1.94% | 2.01% | 1.56% | 1.42% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRMDX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum VMFVX drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRMDX and VMFVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRMDX | VMFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -45.79% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.44% | -14.52% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -22.46% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.61% | -45.79% | +3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.85% | -7.59% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -5.52% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.84% | +0.04% |
Volatility
HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) is 4.65%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that HRMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HRMDX | VMFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 5.31% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 11.35% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 20.59% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 19.55% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 21.88% | -2.46% |