PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRMDX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRMDX achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, HRMDX has underperformed VMFVX with an annualized return of 10.19%, while VMFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.


HRMDX

1D
0.34%
1M
1.23%
YTD
11.97%
6M
11.04%
1Y
12.35%
3Y*
7.97%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
10.19%

VMFVX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.28%
YTD
11.13%
6M
9.55%
1Y
21.20%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRMDX
Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund
11.97%0.12%3.68%13.37%-3.09%28.13%6.93%25.30%-8.58%8.14%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.13%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HRMDX and VMFVX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.94

The correlation between HRMDX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRMDX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRMDX
HRMDX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HRMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HRMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRMDXVMFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

2.13

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

7.35

-3.14

HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRMDX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRMDX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum VMFVX drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRMDX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRMDXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-45.79%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-10.52%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-22.46%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

-22.46%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.61%

-45.79%

+3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.82%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-5.47%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.04%

+0.20%

Volatility

HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) is 3.42%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that HRMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRMDXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

3.88%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

10.67%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

15.28%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

19.42%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

21.89%

-2.48%

HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRMDX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

HRMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than VMFVX's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRMDX
Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund
1.94%2.17%5.93%1.93%5.45%23.95%0.44%2.26%9.68%6.60%0.69%1.80%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.69%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRMDX and VMFVX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMFVX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to HRMDX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRMDX dropped -42.61% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

VMFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRMDX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer