HRMDX vs. ACLAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HRMDX (Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund) and ACLAX (American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HRMDX returned 10.14%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for ACLAX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HRMDX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for ACLAX.

Performance

HRMDX vs. ACLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HRMDX having a 15.61% return and ACLAX slightly lower at 15.09%. Over the past 10 years, HRMDX has outperformed ACLAX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while ACLAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.17% annualized return.

HRMDX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 8.77%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 1Y: 16.78%
• 3Y*: 6.25%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 10.14%
• ALL TIME*: 8.89%

ACLAX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 2.00%
• 6M: 10.08%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: 9.17%
• ALL TIME*: 9.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HRMDX vs. ACLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund	15.61%	0.12%	3.68%	13.37%	-3.09%	28.13%	6.93%	25.30%	-8.58%	8.14%
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class	15.09%	8.52%	8.18%	5.93%	-1.53%	23.01%	1.44%	28.55%	-12.93%	11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between HRMDX and ACLAX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.95

The correlation between HRMDX and ACLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HRMDX vs. ACLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HRMDX

HRMDX Risk / Return Rank: 37
HRMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
HRMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
HRMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
HRMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
HRMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

ACLAX

ACLAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
ACLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ACLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
ACLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ACLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HRMDX vs. ACLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HRMDX	ACLAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.69	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.56	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.30	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	2.33	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.19	7.59	-2.40

HRMDX vs. ACLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the ACLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRMDX and ACLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HRMDX vs. ACLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRMDX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum ACLAX drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRMDX and ACLAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRMDX	ACLAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.61%	-51.37%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-8.50%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	-14.67%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.89%	-17.55%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.61%	-39.24%	-3.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-1.41%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-6.22%	+1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.61%	+0.50%

Volatility

HRMDX vs. ACLAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund (HRMDX) is 3.16%, while American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that HRMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRMDX	ACLAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	3.42%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.85%	8.60%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.93%	11.79%	+1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.20%	14.58%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.26%	17.41%	+1.85%

HRMDX vs. ACLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ACLAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

HRMDX vs. ACLAX - Dividend Comparison

HRMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than ACLAX's 12.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class	12.54%	14.24%	8.53%	5.01%	14.77%	15.72%	1.62%	1.23%	14.17%	9.25%	3.82%	10.86%
HRMDX Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund	1.88%	2.17%	5.93%	1.93%	5.45%	23.95%	0.44%	2.26%	9.68%	6.60%	0.69%	1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HRMDX and ACLAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, HRMDX and ACLAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HRMDX or ACLAX?

ACLAX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to HRMDX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRMDX dropped -42.61% vs ACLAX's -51.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.