ACLAX vs. FASPX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX).
ACLAX is managed by American Century. It was launched on Mar 31, 2004. FASPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 20, 1986.
Performance
ACLAX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACLAX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class | 0.93% | 8.52% | 8.18% | 5.93% | -1.53% | 23.01% | 1.44% | 28.55% | -12.93% | 11.31% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 3.31% | 7.76% | -2.60% | 19.93% | -7.82% | 32.65% | 7.70% | 33.85% | -17.27% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLAX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 3.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLAX has underperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 8.37%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.33% annualized return.
ACLAX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
FASPX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACLAX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACLAX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank
ACLAX
FASPX
ACLAX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLAX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.94 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 1.46 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.19 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.25 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 5.06 | -2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLAX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.94 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.31 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.43 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLAX and FASPX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACLAX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison
ACLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.04%, more than FASPX's 9.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class | 14.04% | 14.24% | 8.53% | 5.01% | 14.77% | 15.72% | 1.62% | 1.23% | 14.17% | 9.25% | 3.82% | 10.86% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 9.02% | 9.32% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 1.93% | 7.80% | 0.55% | 4.98% | 15.67% | 7.26% | 21.61% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
ACLAX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLAX drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLAX and FASPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLAX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.37% | -70.11% | +18.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -15.26% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.55% | -34.53% | +16.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.24% | -48.02% | +8.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -9.84% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -9.87% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.76% | -0.81% |
Volatility
ACLAX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) is 3.69%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that ACLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACLAX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 5.25% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 12.52% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 22.49% | -6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 20.62% | -5.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 21.96% | -4.48% |