PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRCPX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRCPX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRCPX achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.14% return. Over the past 10 years, HRCPX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 17.85%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.20% annualized return.


HRCPX

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.57%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.54%
1Y
33.82%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
17.85%

RYGRX

1D
0.92%
1M
11.15%
YTD
30.14%
6M
30.55%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRCPX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRCPX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund
11.31%23.00%35.17%39.55%-29.18%30.55%28.89%31.50%-7.37%31.43%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
30.14%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HRCPX and RYGRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.91

The correlation between HRCPX and RYGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRCPX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRCPX
HRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRCPX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRCPXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.53

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

13.56

-3.89

HRCPX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRCPX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRCPXRYGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.00

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.47

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.58

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.44

+0.17

Drawdowns

HRCPX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRCPX drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, roughly equal to the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRCPX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRCPXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.83%

-54.22%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-11.17%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.28%

-24.95%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.75%

-36.57%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.85%

-36.63%

+4.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-9.41%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

2.91%

+0.68%

Volatility

HRCPX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) is 3.59%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that HRCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRCPXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

6.39%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

16.30%

-4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

19.71%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

23.50%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

22.88%

-1.68%

HRCPX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRCPX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRCPX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

HRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than RYGRX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRCPX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund
3.70%4.11%12.74%11.75%21.31%6.96%15.23%1.57%10.41%6.44%6.36%15.16%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.91%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRCPX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to HRCPX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRCPX dropped -56.83% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

HRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRCPX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer