HRCPX vs. AMZA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HRCPX (Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both funds - HRCPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds, while AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past 10 years, HRCPX returned 17.71%/yr vs 5.02%/yr for AMZA. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HRCPX charges 1.00%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.

Performance

HRCPX vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRCPX achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 22.69% return. Over the past 10 years, HRCPX has outperformed AMZA with an annualized return of 17.71%, while AMZA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.02% annualized return.

HRCPX

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 6.00%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 26.37%
• 3Y*: 25.66%
• 5Y*: 14.92%
• 10Y*: 17.71%

AMZA

• 1D: 2.77%
• 1M: -3.10%
• YTD: 22.69%
• 6M: 22.31%
• 1Y: 19.14%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 19.14%
• 10Y*: 5.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRCPX vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HRCPX Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund	6.00%	23.00%	35.17%	39.55%	-29.18%	30.55%	28.89%	31.50%	-7.37%	31.43%
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	22.69%	0.17%	30.90%	23.35%	33.20%	51.22%	-49.25%	6.27%	-26.78%	-6.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HRCPX and AMZA is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014	0.33

The correlation between HRCPX and AMZA shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HRCPX vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRCPX

HRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 36
HRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
HRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
HRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
HRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

AMZA

AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 30
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRCPX vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HRCPX	AMZA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.08	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.59	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.19	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.58	+0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.49	3.87	+3.62

HRCPX vs. AMZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the AMZA Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRCPX and AMZA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HRCPX vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRCPX drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRCPX and AMZA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRCPX	AMZA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.83%	-91.46%	+34.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.43%	-12.16%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.28%	-18.56%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.75%	-25.15%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.85%	-86.84%	+54.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.14%	-9.84%	+4.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.15%	-44.85%	+35.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	4.95%	-1.21%

Volatility

HRCPX vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison

Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) have volatilities of 5.86% and 5.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRCPX	AMZA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	5.85%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	13.53%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.38%	17.92%	-1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.54%	25.67%	-4.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.27%	37.20%	-15.93%

HRCPX vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRCPX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

HRCPX vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison

HRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than AMZA's 8.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	8.16%	8.81%	7.29%	9.40%	7.65%	10.24%	22.13%	19.47%	34.46%	24.16%	18.36%	18.21%
HRCPX Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund	3.88%	4.11%	12.74%	11.75%	21.31%	6.96%	15.23%	1.57%	10.41%	6.44%	6.36%	15.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HRCPX and AMZA in my portfolio?

HRCPX and AMZA have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HRCPX or AMZA?

HRCPX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to AMZA (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRCPX dropped -56.83% vs AMZA's -91.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.