PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQU.TO vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HQU.TO vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HQU.TO vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
-19.26%26.77%40.01%114.00%-61.73%45.37%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
2.63%13.89%27.42%40.17%-20.59%16.52%
Different Trading Currencies

HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while QTAP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTAP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a -19.26% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 2.63% return.


HQU.TO

1D
-1.54%
1M
-16.22%
YTD
-19.26%
6M
-17.81%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
29.55%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
25.93%

QTAP

1D
-0.62%
1M
2.07%
YTD
2.63%
6M
3.64%
1Y
15.74%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HQU.TO vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

HQU.TO vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQU.TO vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQU.TOQTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

0.97

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

1.45

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.47

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.41

7.68

-5.27

HQU.TO vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQU.TO and QTAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQU.TOQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.97

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.81

-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between HQU.TO and QTAP is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HQU.TO vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither HQU.TO nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HQU.TO vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -23.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and QTAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HQU.TOQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-29.44%

-66.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-12.04%

-13.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.85%

-0.51%

-25.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.80%

-5.21%

-50.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.85%

1.68%

+6.17%

Volatility

HQU.TO vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.77%. This indicates that HQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HQU.TOQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.02%

1.77%

+9.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.66%

4.29%

+20.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.35%

16.43%

+27.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.83%

17.40%

+27.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.72%

17.40%

+27.32%