PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while MON100.NS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MON100.NS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a 41.30% return, which is significantly lower than MON100.NS's 47.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HQU.TO has outperformed MON100.NS with an annualized return of 33.31%, while MON100.NS has yielded a comparatively lower 28.64% annualized return.


HQU.TO

1D
0.95%
1M
22.05%
YTD
41.30%
6M
36.32%
1Y
81.34%
3Y*
46.99%
5Y*
23.89%
10Y*
33.31%

MON100.NS

1D
0.99%
1M
14.66%
YTD
47.83%
6M
43.92%
1Y
91.41%
3Y*
45.04%
5Y*
31.95%
10Y*
28.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
41.30%26.77%40.01%114.00%-61.73%52.20%83.84%80.24%-11.03%68.57%
MON100.NS
Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF
47.83%3.65%69.80%50.07%-20.82%29.03%48.20%33.01%-1.70%27.92%

Correlation

The correlation between HQU.TO and MON100.NS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MON100.NS
MON100.NS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MON100.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MON100.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MON100.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MON100.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MON100.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQU.TOMON100.NSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.79

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

6.43

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

16.30

-5.10

HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is lower than the MON100.NS Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQU.TO and MON100.NS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQU.TOMON100.NSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

4.55

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.55

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

1.25

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

1.14

-1.08

Drawdowns

HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than MON100.NS's maximum drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and MON100.NS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HQU.TOMON100.NSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-33.25%

-62.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-14.70%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.00%

-27.74%

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

-27.74%

-37.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

-33.25%

-31.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.29%

-7.20%

-48.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

5.73%

+1.81%

Volatility

HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) at 4.87%. This indicates that HQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MON100.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HQU.TOMON100.NSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

4.87%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.33%

15.82%

+8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

20.75%

+11.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.90%

21.08%

+23.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.87%

23.46%

+21.41%

Dividends

HQU.TO vs. MON100.NS - Dividend Comparison

Neither HQU.TO nor MON100.NS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HQU.TO and MON100.NS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Motilal Oswal.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQU.TO and MON100.NS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer