PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQU.TO vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HQU.TO vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while COPX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a 41.30% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 27.31% return. Over the past 10 years, HQU.TO has outperformed COPX with an annualized return of 33.31%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively lower 22.83% annualized return.


HQU.TO

1D
0.95%
1M
22.05%
YTD
41.30%
6M
36.32%
1Y
81.34%
3Y*
46.99%
5Y*
23.89%
10Y*
33.31%

COPX

1D
-3.25%
1M
20.09%
YTD
27.31%
6M
36.37%
1Y
123.67%
3Y*
38.95%
5Y*
23.30%
10Y*
22.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQU.TO vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
41.30%26.77%40.01%114.00%-61.73%52.20%83.84%80.24%-11.03%68.57%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
27.31%84.63%12.46%5.99%6.31%22.27%49.09%6.95%-25.48%30.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HQU.TO and COPX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010

0.45

HQU.TO vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HQU.TO
COPX

Technology

52.7%

-

Communication Services

15.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Healthcare

5.0%

-

Industrials

3.5%
3.7%

Basic Materials

1.3%
96.3%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

HQU.TO
52.7%
COPX

-

Communication Services

HQU.TO
15.2%
COPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

HQU.TO
14.3%
COPX

-

Consumer Defensive

HQU.TO
5.5%
COPX

-

Healthcare

HQU.TO
5.0%
COPX

-

Industrials

HQU.TO
3.5%
COPX
3.7%

Basic Materials

HQU.TO
1.3%
COPX
96.3%

Utilities

HQU.TO
1.2%
COPX

-

Energy

HQU.TO
0.6%
COPX

-

Financial Services

HQU.TO
0.5%
COPX

-

Real Estate

HQU.TO
0.2%
COPX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HQU.TO vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQU.TO vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQU.TOCOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

4.54

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

14.98

-3.78

HQU.TO vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQU.TO and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQU.TOCOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

3.11

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.70

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.71

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.28

-0.22

Drawdowns

HQU.TO vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than COPX's maximum drawdown of -75.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and COPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HQU.TOCOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-75.17%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-27.39%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.00%

-36.90%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

-39.37%

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

-59.78%

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.91%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.29%

-31.72%

-23.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

8.29%

-0.75%

Volatility

HQU.TO vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) is 9.22%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that HQU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HQU.TOCOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

15.34%

-6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.33%

34.54%

-10.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

40.01%

-8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.90%

33.35%

+11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.87%

32.49%

+12.38%

Dividends

HQU.TO vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

HQU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.13%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HQU.TO and COPX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HQU.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while COPX is Materials.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQU.TO and COPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer