PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQL vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HQL vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQL achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 3.42% return.


HQL

1D
2.01%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
9.82%
6M
7.20%
1Y
55.99%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.05%

PFFA

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.42%
6M
4.32%
1Y
14.72%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQL vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HQL
Tekla Life Sciences Investors
9.82%45.48%11.03%4.23%-19.21%5.52%23.72%25.53%-15.34%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
3.42%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HQL and PFFA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HQL vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQL
HQL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQL vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQLPFFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

2.28

+3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.17

7.75

+10.42

HQL vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQL and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQLPFFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.11

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.58

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.24

+0.07

Drawdowns

HQL vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQL drawdown since its inception was -62.65%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQL and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HQLPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.65%

-70.52%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

-6.49%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-12.15%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.86%

-22.70%

-16.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-1.17%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

-6.65%

-15.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.90%

+1.19%

Volatility

HQL vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 1.87%. This indicates that HQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HQLPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

1.87%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

5.69%

+8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.04%

7.03%

+14.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.63%

11.51%

+9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

31.84%

-9.59%

Dividends

HQL vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

HQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than PFFA's 9.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HQL
Tekla Life Sciences Investors
11.81%10.85%14.18%9.44%9.57%8.79%7.90%8.03%10.72%8.25%12.18%11.84%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.59%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HQL and PFFA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HQL has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to PFFA (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HQL dropped -62.65% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

HQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQL and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer