HQGO vs. SEIQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HQGO (Hartford US Quality Growth ETF) and SEIQ (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. HQGO is passively managed, while SEIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, HQGO returned 23.04% vs 13.95% for SEIQ. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HQGO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIQ.

Performance

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQGO achieves a 11.00% return, which is significantly higher than SEIQ's 7.10% return.

HQGO

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 2.07%
• 6M: 9.26%
• YTD: 11.00%
• 1Y: 23.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.56%

SEIQ

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 3.20%
• 6M: 5.93%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 1Y: 13.95%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	$5.49K	$7.53K	$51.76K
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	$2.02M	$3.08M	$2.15M

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	11.00%	15.15%	25.09%	5.10%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	7.10%	12.51%	16.15%	3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HQGO and SEIQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	0.84

The correlation between HQGO and SEIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HQGO	SEIQ
Technology	42.3%	34.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	10.0%
Healthcare	10.4%	19.4%
Communication Services	9.9%	5.3%
Industrials	7.0%	6.7%
Financial Services	6.7%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	13.1%
Energy	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	0.9%
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Utilities	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

HQGO vs. SEIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HQGO

HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 62
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SEIQ

SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HQGO	SEIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.22	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.75	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	1.45	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.45	5.49	+2.96

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the SEIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQGO and SEIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, which is greater than SEIQ's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and SEIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HQGO	SEIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.85%	-14.87%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-9.66%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.52%	-2.68%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	2.55%	+0.18%

Volatility

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) is 3.62%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that HQGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HQGO	SEIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.62%	4.01%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	9.30%	+1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.18%	11.53%	+2.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	14.58%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.90%	14.58%	+2.32%

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIQ's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

HQGO vs. SEIQ - Dividend Comparison

HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than SEIQ's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF	0.45%	0.51%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	0.89%	0.94%	0.97%	1.08%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HQGO and SEIQ in my portfolio?

HQGO and SEIQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HQGO or SEIQ?

SEIQ has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to HQGO (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HQGO dropped -20.85% vs SEIQ's -14.87%.

Which ETF is better, HQGO or SEIQ?

On 1-year performance, HQGO leads with 23.04% vs 13.95% for SEIQ. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HQGO has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HQGO or SEIQ?

Over the 1-year period, HQGO has performed better with a 23.04% return vs 13.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HQGO or SEIQ?

SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for HQGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HQGO or SEIQ?

SEIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.45% for HQGO.

What is the main difference between HQGO and SEIQ?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for HQGO and 0.15% for SEIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HQGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.