HPYM.TO vs. CNQE.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HPYM.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Harvest, while CNQE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. HPYM.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CNQE.TO.

Performance

HPYM.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPYM.TO achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 38.88% return.

HPYM.TO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: -1.11%
• 6M: -1.25%
• 1Y: 2.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNQE.TO

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 38.88%
• 6M: 34.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPYM.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units	-1.11%	2.23%
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	38.88%	13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HPYM.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

HPYM.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPYM.TO

HPYM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 17
HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
HPYM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
HPYM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 16
HPYM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
HPYM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPYM.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HPYM.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HPYM.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	2.45	-2.07

Drawdowns

HPYM.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPYM.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum CNQE.TO drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYM.TO and CNQE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HPYM.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-18.22%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.56%	-6.40%	+3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-4.14%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HPYM.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.53%	33.04%	-28.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.60%	33.04%	-27.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.60%	33.04%	-27.44%

HPYM.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPYM.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CNQE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HPYM.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HPYM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, which matches CNQE.TO's 9.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	9.43%	4.42%	0.00%
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units	9.36%	9.01%	8.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HPYM.TO and CNQE.TO in my portfolio?

HPYM.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HPYM.TO or CNQE.TO?

On fees, CNQE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HPYM.TO or CNQE.TO?

CNQE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HPYM.TO.

What is the main difference between HPYM.TO and CNQE.TO?

HPYM.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while CNQE.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HPYM.TO and 0.40% for CNQE.TO.