PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF (HPYE.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HPYE.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
6.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNQE.TO

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.72%
YTD
38.88%
6M
34.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HPYE.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

-0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF (HPYE.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPYE.TOCNQE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.35

2.45

-0.09

Drawdowns

HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPYE.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum CNQE.TO drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYE.TO and CNQE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPYE.TOCNQE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-18.22%

+12.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.40%

+6.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-4.14%

+2.77%

Volatility

HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPYE.TOCNQE.TODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

33.04%

-20.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.93%

33.04%

-20.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.93%

33.04%

-20.11%

HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPYE.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CNQE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HPYE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HPYE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than CNQE.TO's 9.43% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HPYE.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNQE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNQE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HPYE.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HPYE.TO and 0.40% for CNQE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPYE.TO and CNQE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer