HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO
HPYE.TO (Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF) and METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest Portfolios Group. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HPYE.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for METE.TO.
Performance
HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HPYE.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METE.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- -10.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HPYE.TO Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF | 8.80% |
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPYE.TO and METE.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HPYE.TO
METE.TO
HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF (HPYE.TO) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPYE.TO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.04 | -0.18 | +2.22 |
Drawdowns
HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPYE.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum METE.TO drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYE.TO and METE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPYE.TO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -40.10% | +34.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -26.11% | +25.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -15.66% | +14.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.45% | — |
Volatility
HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPYE.TO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.99% | 36.31% | -23.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 41.89% | -28.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 41.89% | -28.90% |
HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPYE.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than METE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HPYE.TO vs. METE.TO - Dividend Comparison
HPYE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, less than METE.TO's 27.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HPYE.TO Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF | 5.10% | 0.00% |
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 27.18% | 21.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPYE.TO and METE.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HPYE.TO.
Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HPYE.TO and 0.40% for METE.TO.
Find the right allocation for HPYE.TO and METE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer