HOSBX vs. HNASX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HOSBX (Homestead Funds Short Term Bond Fund) and HNASX (Homestead Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - HOSBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Homestead, while HNASX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Homestead. Over the past 10 years, HOSBX returned 1.98%/yr vs 17.28%/yr for HNASX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. HOSBX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for HNASX.

Performance

HOSBX vs. HNASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Homestead Funds Short Term Bond Fund (HOSBX) and Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOSBX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than HNASX's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HOSBX has underperformed HNASX with an annualized return of 1.98%, while HNASX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.28% annualized return.

HOSBX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: -0.07%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: 3.01%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: 1.98%

HNASX

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -2.51%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: -1.17%
• 1Y: 12.93%
• 3Y*: 20.57%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: 17.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOSBX vs. HNASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HOSBX Homestead Funds Short Term Bond Fund	-0.07%	5.87%	3.78%	5.08%	-5.71%	-1.11%	5.38%	3.89%	1.45%	1.66%
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund	-0.21%	16.97%	30.93%	47.78%	-33.56%	16.94%	38.72%	28.39%	2.84%	36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between HOSBX and HNASX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2001	-0.07

The correlation between HOSBX and HNASX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HOSBX vs. HNASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOSBX

HOSBX Risk / Return Rank: 31
HOSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
HOSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HOSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
HOSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
HOSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

HNASX

HNASX Risk / Return Rank: 10
HNASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
HNASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HNASX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HNASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HNASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOSBX vs. HNASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Funds Short Term Bond Fund (HOSBX) and Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOSBX	HNASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	0.81	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.18	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.15	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	0.74	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.99	2.26	+4.73

HOSBX vs. HNASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOSBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the HNASX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOSBX and HNASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOSBX vs. HNASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOSBX drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum HNASX drawdown of -72.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOSBX and HNASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOSBX	HNASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-72.74%	+63.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.59%	-18.90%	+17.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.59%	-21.23%	+19.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.84%	-37.22%	+28.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.84%	-37.22%	+28.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-6.05%	+5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-24.63%	+23.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	6.16%	-5.70%

Volatility

HOSBX vs. HNASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Homestead Funds Short Term Bond Fund (HOSBX) is 0.91%, while Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that HOSBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOSBX	HNASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	6.66%	-5.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.85%	13.93%	-12.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43%	17.31%	-14.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.01%	22.44%	-19.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.42%	21.88%	-19.46%

HOSBX vs. HNASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOSBX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HNASX's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOSBX vs. HNASX - Dividend Comparison

HOSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than HNASX's 15.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund	15.34%	15.31%	6.29%	2.57%	6.80%	9.12%	4.73%	5.35%	10.41%	6.41%	1.54%	6.52%
HOSBX Homestead Funds Short Term Bond Fund	3.82%	3.86%	3.50%	2.85%	1.74%	1.37%	3.57%	2.66%	1.83%	1.65%	1.55%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOSBX and HNASX in my portfolio?

HOSBX and HNASX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOSBX or HNASX?

HNASX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to HOSBX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOSBX dropped -8.84% vs HNASX's -72.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOSBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.