HOOZ vs. SH
HOOZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds - HOOZ tracks the Robinhood Markets, Inc. while SH tracks the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOOZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.
Performance
HOOZ vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOZ achieves a -43.35% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -4.96% return.
HOOZ
- 1D
- -11.54%
- 1M
- -52.19%
- YTD
- -43.35%
- 6M
- -38.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- -3.73%
- 1Y
- -12.35%
- 3Y*
- -11.55%
- 5Y*
- -8.21%
- 10Y*
- -12.84%
HOOZ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF | -43.35% | 2.80% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -4.96% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOZ and SH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOZ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
HOOZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SH
HOOZ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF (HOOZ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOZ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOZ drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOZ and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.16% | -94.66% | +17.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.37% | -94.44% | +21.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.87% | -67.80% | +34.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.29% | — |
Volatility
HOOZ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.36% | 12.40% | +132.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.36% | 16.94% | +128.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.36% | 18.01% | +127.35% |
HOOZ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOZ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
HOOZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.11% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOZ and SH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOZ.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.00% for HOOZ.
HOOZ tracks Robinhood Markets, Inc., while SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOZ and 0.89% for SH.
Find the right allocation for HOOZ and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer