HOOZ vs. EMTY
HOOZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - HOOZ tracks the Robinhood Markets, Inc. while EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.
Performance
HOOZ vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOZ achieves a -11.18% return, which is significantly lower than EMTY's 1.48% return.
HOOZ
- 1D
- 13.13%
- 1M
- -22.74%
- YTD
- -11.18%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMTY
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 1.19%
- 3Y*
- -4.19%
- 5Y*
- -2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
HOOZ vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF | -11.18% | -2.76% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 1.48% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOZ and EMTY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOZ vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank
HOOZ
EMTY
HOOZ vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF (HOOZ) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOOZ | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | -0.43 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
HOOZ vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOZ drawdown since its inception was -66.52%, smaller than the maximum EMTY drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOZ and EMTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOZ | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.52% | -77.62% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.26% | -74.67% | +16.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.37% | -54.03% | +24.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.12% | — |
Volatility
HOOZ vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOZ | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.04% | 17.65% | +128.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.04% | 22.36% | +123.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.04% | 25.66% | +120.38% |
HOOZ vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOZ vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison
HOOZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 3.44% | 3.83% | 6.00% | 4.41% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.03% |
HOOZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOZ and EMTY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOZ.
EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for HOOZ.
HOOZ tracks Robinhood Markets, Inc., while EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOZ and 0.66% for EMTY.
Find the right allocation for HOOZ and EMTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer