HOOZ vs. QQQT
HOOZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF) and QQQT (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Robinhood Markets, Inc., while QQQT is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. HOOZ is passively managed, while QQQT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. HOOZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for QQQT.
Performance
HOOZ vs. QQQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOZ achieves a -54.21% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT's 13.83% return.
HOOZ
- 1D
- 16.13%
- 1M
- -26.74%
- 6M
- -54.35%
- YTD
- -54.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQT
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- YTD
- 13.83%
- 1Y
- 22.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOZ vs. QQQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF | -54.21% | 2.80% |
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF | 13.83% | -1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOZ and QQQT is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | -0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOZ vs. QQQT — Risk / Return Rank
HOOZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQT
HOOZ vs. QQQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF (HOOZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOZ | QQQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOZ vs. QQQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOZ drawdown since its inception was -81.86%, which is greater than QQQT's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOZ and QQQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOZ | QQQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.86% | -22.50% | -59.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.48% | -4.98% | -73.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.49% | -3.96% | -32.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility
HOOZ vs. QQQT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOZ | QQQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 144.22% | 17.19% | +127.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.22% | 20.77% | +123.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.22% | 20.77% | +123.45% |
HOOZ vs. QQQT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQT's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOZ vs. QQQT - Dividend Comparison
HOOZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HOOZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF | 20.47% | 21.27% | 10.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOZ and QQQT have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOZ.
QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 20.47%, compared with 0.00% for HOOZ.
HOOZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQT is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOZ and 1.05% for QQQT.
Find the right allocation for HOOZ and QQQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer