PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOZ vs. PLTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOZ vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF (HOOZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOZ achieves a -11.18% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 14.08% return.


HOOZ

1D
13.13%
1M
-22.74%
YTD
-11.18%
6M
15.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTZ

1D
8.60%
1M
-11.35%
YTD
14.08%
6M
15.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOZ vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOZ and PLTZ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOZ vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF (HOOZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOOZ vs. PLTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOZPLTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

-0.59

+0.43

Drawdowns

HOOZ vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOZ drawdown since its inception was -66.52%, smaller than the maximum PLTZ drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOZ and PLTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOZPLTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.52%

-70.28%

+3.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.26%

-59.38%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-52.09%

+22.72%

Volatility

HOOZ vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOZPLTZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.04%

101.97%

+44.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.04%

101.97%

+44.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.04%

101.97%

+44.07%

HOOZ vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOZ vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither HOOZ nor PLTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOZ and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOZ.

HOOZ and PLTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOZ and 1.29% for PLTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOZ and PLTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer